Dispute Processes : ADR and the Primary Forms of Decision-Making / Simon Roberts, Michael Palmer.
By: Roberts, Simon [author.]
Contributor(s): Palmer, Michael [author.]
Material type:
TextSeries: Law in ContextPublisher: Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2005Edition: 2nd edDescription: 1 online resource (408 pages) : digital, PDF file(s)Content type: text Media type: computer Carrier type: online resourceISBN: 9780511805295 (ebook)Subject(s): Dispute resolution (Law)Additional physical formats: Print version: : No titleLOC classification: K2390 | .P35 2005Online resources: Online access link to the resource Summary: This wide-ranging study considers the primary forms of decision-making - negotiation, mediation, and umpiring - in the context of rapidly changing discourses and practices of civil justice across many jurisdictions. Much contemporary discussion in this field, and associated projects of institutional design, are taking place under the wide ranging but imprecise label of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). If a common linking theme is sought, the authors argue that this must lie in a general shift of priorities as between judgement and settlement in ideological terms. This new edition brings together and analyses a wide range of materials dealing with dispute processes and the current debates on civil justice. With the help of a selection of texts beyond those ordinarily found in the emerging alternative dispute resolution literature it provides a broad, comparative perspective on modes of handling civil disputes, with the principal focus on the central processes of negotiation and mediation.
| Item type | Current location | Home library | Collection | Call number | Status | Notes | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E-Book
|
Merkez Kütüphane | Merkez Kütüphane | E-Kitap Koleksiyonu | K2390 .P35 2005EBK (Browse shelf) | Geçerli değil-e-Kitap / Not applicable-e-Book | HUK | EBK01240 |
Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 02 May 2017).
This wide-ranging study considers the primary forms of decision-making - negotiation, mediation, and umpiring - in the context of rapidly changing discourses and practices of civil justice across many jurisdictions. Much contemporary discussion in this field, and associated projects of institutional design, are taking place under the wide ranging but imprecise label of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). If a common linking theme is sought, the authors argue that this must lie in a general shift of priorities as between judgement and settlement in ideological terms. This new edition brings together and analyses a wide range of materials dealing with dispute processes and the current debates on civil justice. With the help of a selection of texts beyond those ordinarily found in the emerging alternative dispute resolution literature it provides a broad, comparative perspective on modes of handling civil disputes, with the principal focus on the central processes of negotiation and mediation.
There are no comments for this item.