TY  - GEN
AU  - Groppi,Tania
AU  - Ponthoreau,Marie-Claire
TI  - The use of foreign precedents by constitutional judges
T2  - Hart studies in comparative public law ;|vv. 1
SN  - 9781849462716
AV  - K7680 .U84 2013
PY  - 2013///
CY  - Oxford, United Kingdom ;Portland, Or.
PB  - Hart Pub.
KW  - Stare decisis
KW  - Emsal kararlar
KW  - etuturkob
KW  - Hükümler, yabancı
KW  - Judgments, Foreign
KW  - Anayasa mahkemeleri
KW  - Constitutional courts
N1  - Includes bibliographical references; Introduction; Pt. 2; Conclusion; Tania Groppi and Marie-Claire Ponthoreau --|g Pt. 1; Cheryl Saunders and Adrienne Stone. --; Gianluca Gentili --|t India: a "critical" use of foreign precedents in constitutional adjudication; Valentina Rita Scotti --; Cristina Fasone --; Suzie Navot --; Irene Spigno --; Christa Rautenbach --; Anna Gamper --; Stefan Martini --; Zoltán Szente --; Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor and Rubén Sánchez Gil --; Elena Simina Tanasescu and Stefan Deaconu --; Sergey Belov --; Wen-Chen Chang and Jiunn-Rong Yeh --; Angioletta Sperti --; Tania Groppi and Marie-Clair Ponthoreau; the methodology of the research : how to assess the reality of transjudicial communication?; Reference to foreign precedents by the Australian High Court: a matter of method; Canada: protecting rights in a "worldwide rights culture", an empirical study of the use of foreign precedents by the Supreme Court of Canada (1982-2010); The Supreme Court of Ireland and the use of foreign precedents: the value of constitutional history; Israel: creating a constitution: the use of foreign precedents by the Supreme Court (1994-2010); Namibia: the Supreme Court as a foreign law importer; South Africa: teaching an "old dog" new tricks? an empirical study of the use of foreign precedents by the South African Constitutional Court (1995-2010); Austria : non-cosmopolitan, but Europe-friendly : the Constitutional Court's comparative approach; Lifting the constitutional curtain? the use of foreign precedent by the German Federal Constitutional Court; Hungary : unsystematic and incoherent borrowing of law : the use of foreign judicial precedents in the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court, 1999-2010; A gap between the apparent and hidden attitudes of the Supreme Court of Japan towards foreign precedents /|rAkiko Ejima --; Mexico : struggling for an open view in constitutional adjudication; Romania: analogical reasoning as a dialectical instrument; Russia: foreign transplants in the Russian Constitution and invisible foreign precedents in decisions of the Russian Constitutional Court; Judges as discursive agent : the use of foreign precedents by the Constitutional Court of Taiwan; United States of America : first cautious attempts of judicial use of foreign precedents in the Supreme Court's jurisprudence; The use of foreign precedents by constitutional judges : a limited practice, an uncertain future
ER  -