000 09683cam a2200445 a 4500
999 _c200430966
_d49177
001 200430966
003 TR-AnTOB
005 20200316151017.0
007 ta
008 941110s1996 nyu b 001 0 eng d
010 _a 94079822
020 _a0155008277
020 _a9780195155129 (hardback)
035 _a(NhCcYBP)YBT 94079822
035 _a(OCoLC)33098217
035 _a(NhCcYBP)YBP98246120518
035 _a(TR-AnTOB)200430966
040 _aFTS
_beng
_erda
_cFTS
_dDLC
_dOrLoB-B
_dOCoLC
_dTR-AnTOB
041 0 _aeng
042 _alccopycat
043 _an-us---
050 0 0 _aK231
_b.P46 1996
090 _aK231
_b.S33 1996
100 1 _aSchauer, Frederick F.
_eauthor
_9121979
245 1 4 _aThe philosophy of law :
_bclassic and contemporary readings with commentary /
_cFrederick Schauer, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong.
264 1 _aNew York :
_bOxford University Press,
_c[1996]
264 4 _c©1996
300 _axvi, 1002 pages ;
_c25 cm
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _aunmediated
_bn
_2rdamedia
338 _avolume
_bnc
_2rdacarrier
505 2 0 _gCh. 1.
_tWhat is Law?
_g1.1.
_tThe Theory of Natural Law.
_tfrom Summa Theologiae /
_rThomas Aquinas.
_tfrom Natural Law and Natural Rights /
_rJohn Finnis.
_tfrom The Morality of Law /
_rLon Fuller.
_g1.2.
_tLegal Positivism.
_tfrom The Province of Jurisprudence Determined and the Uses of the Study of Jurisprudence /
_rJohn Austin.
_tfrom The Concept of Law /
_rH. L. A. Hart.
_g1.3.
_tLegal Realism and Critical Legal Studies.
_tfrom The Bramble Bush, "A Realistic Jurisprudence," and The Common Law Tradition /
_rKarl Llewellyn.
_tFreedom and Constraint in Adjudication: A Critical Phenomenology /
_rDuncan Kennedy.
_g1.4.
_tRonald Dworkin and Law as Integrity.
_tfrom Taking Rights Seriously /
_rRonald Dworkin.
_tfrom Law's Empire /
_rRonald Dworkin.
_tfrom Playing By the Rules /
_rFrederick Schauer.
_g1.5.
_tCase Study: The Fugitive Slave Laws.
_tfrom Slavery in the Courtroom /
_rPaul Finkelman --
_tExcerpt from official report of the case before Chief Justice Lemuel Shaw (Massachusetts).
_tfrom Justice Accused /
_rRobert M. Cover --
_gCh. 2.
_tLegal Reasoning.
_g2.1.
_tThe Interpretation of Legal Texts.
_tFormalism /
_rFrederick Schauer --
_tHome Building and Loan Association v. Blaisdell.
_tfrom Government by Judiciary /
_rRaoul Berger.
_tfrom The Tempting of America /
_rRobert Bork.
_tThe Misconceived Quest for the Original Understanding /
_rPaul Brest.
_tNatural Law Revisited /
_rRonald Dworkin --
_tUnited States v. Locke.
_tLegal Formalism, Legal Realism, and the Interpretation of Statutes and the Constitution /
_rRichard A. Posner --
_tBray v. Alexandria Women's Health Clinic --
_tNational Organization for Women v. Scheidler.
_g2.2.
_tReasoning from Precedent.
_tOn Analogical Reasoning /
_rCass R. Sunstein.
_tConstrained by Precedent /
_rLarry Alexander.
_tDonoghue v. Stevenson.
_tPlanned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
_g2.3.
_tCritical Perspectives on Legal Reasoning.
_tfrom Law and the Modern Mind /
_rJerome Frank.
_tFollowing the Rules Laid Down /
_rMark Tushnet.
_tIn Context /
_rMartha Minow and Elizabeth Spelman.
_tfrom Economic Analysis of Law /
_rRichard Posner --
_gCh. 3.
_tThe Moral Force of Law.
_g3.1.
_tIs There a Moral Obligation to Obey the Law?
_tLegal Obligation and the Duty of Fair Play /
_rJohn Rawls.
_tThe Principle of Fair Play /
_rA. John Simmons.
_g3.2.
_tCivil Disobedience.
_tThe Justification of Civil Disobedience /
_rJohn Rawls.
_tfrom Democracy and Disobedience /
_rPeter Singer.
_tWalker v. Birmingham --
_gCh. 4.
_tThe Structure and Content of Rights.
_g4.1.
_tThe Structure of Rights.
_tThe Nature and Value of Rights /
_rJoel Feinberg.
_tHard Cases /
_rRonald Dworkin.
_tSome Ruminations on Rights /
_rJudith Jarvis Thomson.
_tCraig v. Boren.
_g4.2.
_tThe Right to Liberty.
_tfrom On Liberty /
_rJohn Stuart Mill.
_tfrom Liberty, Equality, Fraternity /
_rJames FitzJames Stephen.
_tfrom Offense to Others /
_rJoel Feinberg.
_tNew England Naturist Association v. Larsen.
_tfrom On Liberty /
_rJohn Stuart Mill.
_tPaternalism /
_rGerald Dworkin.
_tfrom The Enforcement of Morals /
_rPatrick Devlin.
_tfrom Law, Liberty, and Morality /
_rH. L. A. Hart.
_tBowers v. Hardwick.
_g4.3.
_tA Right to Free Speech.
_tfrom On Liberty /
_rJohn Stuart Mill.
_tA Theory of Freedom of Expression /
_rThomas Scanlon.
_tfrom Free Speech: A Philosophical Enquiry /
_rFrederick Schauer.
_tDefinitional Preliminary.
_tParis Adult Theatre I v. Slaton.
_tPornography, Civil Rights, and 'Speech' /
_rCatharine MacKinnon.
_tAmerican Booksellers Association, Inc. v. Hudnut.
_tWomen and Pornography /
_rRonald Dworkin.
_tCollin v. Smith.
_tCampus Antiracism Rules: Constitutional Narratives in Collision /
_rRichard Delgado.
_tIf He Hollers Let Him Go: Regulating Racist Speech on Campus /
_rCharles Lawrence.
_tRegulating Racist Speech on Campus: A Modest Proposal? /
_rNadine Strossen.
_tUMW Post, Inc. v. Board of Regents of University of Wisconsin.
_g4.4.
_tThe Right to Privacy.
_tGriswold v. Connecticut.
_tInterpretation and Historiography /
_rDavid A. J. Richards.
_tNeutral Principles and Some First Amendment Problems /
_rRobert Bork.
_tRoe v. Wade.
_tThe Root and Branch of Roe v. Wade /
_rJohn Noonan.
_tReflections on Sex Equality Under Law /
_rCatharine MacKinnon.
_tPlanned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
_g4.5.
_tThe Right to Religious Freedom.
_tReligious Belief and Public Morality: A Catholic Governor's Perspective /
_rMario Cuomo.
_tThe Pope's Submarine /
_rJohn Garvey.
_tWallace v. Jaffree.
_tEmployment Division, Oregon Department of Human Resources v. Smith.
_g4.6.
_tThe Right to Property.
_tWhat is Private Property? /
_rJeremy Waldron.
_tUtility and Property /
_rAlan Ryan.
_tfrom The Lockean Theory of Rights /
_rA. John Simmons.
_tPenn Central Transportation Co. v. City of New York --
_gCh. 5.
_tJustice and Equality.
_g5.1.
_tWhat is Justice?
_tThe Empty Idea of Equality /
_rPeter Westen.
_tIs Equality a Totally Empty Idea? /
_rAnthony D'Amato.
_g5.2.
_tTheories of Justice.
_tOn the Connection between Justice and Utility /
_rJohn Stuart Mill.
_tfrom A Theory of Justice /
_rJohn Rawls.
_tfrom Anarchy, State, and Utopia /
_rRobert Nozick.
_tMorality and the Liberal Ideal /
_rMichael Sandel.
_g5.3.
_tDiscrimination.
_tThe Equal Protection of the Laws /
_rJoseph Tussman and Jacobus tenBroek.
_tGroups and the Equal Protection Clause /
_rOwen Fiss.
_tBrown v. Board of Education.
_g5.4.
_tPreferential Treatment.
_tWhy Bakke Has No Case /
_rRonald Dworkin.
_tWhy Racial Preference is Illegal and Immoral /
_rCarl Cohen.
_tRegents of University of California v. Bakke.
_tMetro Broadcasting, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission et al.
_g5.5.
_tEquality for Women.
_tReflections on Sex Equality Under Law /
_rCatharine MacKinnon.
_tfrom Forbidden Grounds: The Case Against Employment Discrimination Laws /
_rRichard Epstein.
_tCalifornia Federal Savings and Loan v. Guerra.
_tMeritor Savings Bank v. Vinson.
_g5.6.
_tEquality for Homosexuals.
_tGay Rights /
_rRichard Mohr.
_tSodom and Begorrah /
_rErnest van den Haag.
_tWatkins v. United States Army.
_g5.7.
_tOther Kinds of Discrimination --
_gCh. 6.
_tPunishment.
_g6.1.
_tThe Nature of Punishment.
_g6.2.
_tTheories of Punishment.
_g6.3.
_tUtilitarian Theories of Punishment.
_tfrom An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation /
_rJeremy Bentham.
_tTwo Concepts of Rules /
_rJohn Rawls.
_g6.4.
_tRetributivisms.
_tOn the Right to Punish /
_rImmanuel Kant.
_tHarm and Retribution /
_rMichael Davis.
_g6.5.
_tCombinations and Alternatives.
_g6.6.
_tCapital Punishment.
_tThe Collapse of the Case Against Capital Punishment /
_rErnest van den Haag.
_tJustice, Civilization, and the Death Penalty /
_rJeffrey Reiman.
_tDoes it Matter if the Death Penalty is Arbitrarily Administered? /
_rStephen Nathanson.
_tFurman v. Georgia.
_tGregg v. Georgia.
_tMcCleskey v. Kemp.
_tHerrera v. Texas --
_gCh. 7.
_tResponsibility.
_g7.1.
_tWhat is Responsibility?
_g7.2.
_tLegal Causation.
_tfrom Causation in the Law /
_rH. L. A. Hart and Tony Honore.
_tPalsgraf v. Long Island Railroad.
_g7.3.
_tResponsibility for Omissions.
_tA Theory of Strict Liability /
_rRichard Epstein.
_tThe Case for a Duty to Rescue /
_rErnest Weinrib.
_tFarwell v. Keaton.
_g7.4.
_tMens Rea and Strict Liability.
_tStrict Liability in the Criminal Law /
_rRichard A. Wasserstrom.
_tTison v. Arizona.
_tLords' Decision on the Law of Rape /
_rGlanville Williams.
_tfrom Real Rape /
_rSusan Estrich.
_tCommonwealth v. Sherry.
_g7.5.
_tThe Insanity Defense.
_tfrom Madness and the Criminal Law /
_rNorval Morris.
_tThe Moral Basis of the Insanity Defense /
_rRichard Bonnie.
_tSelection from the transcript of John Hinckley's trial --
_gCh. 8.
_tLegal Procedure and Evidence.
_g8.1.
_tThe Burden of Proof.
_tDecision Theory and the Factfinding Process /
_rJohn Kaplan.
_tOn the Degree of Confidence for Adverse Decisions /
_rFrederick Schauer and Richard Zeckhauser.
_tIn re Winship.
_g8.2.
_tProbability and the Law of Evidence.
_tHuman Information Processing and Adjudication: Trial by Heuristics /
_rMichael J. Saks and Robert F. Kidd.
_tLiability and Individualized Evidence /
_rJudith Jarvis Thomson.
_tSmith v. Rapid Transit, Inc.
_tPeople v. Collins.
_g8.3.
_tCriminal Procedure and the Exclusionary Rule.
_tThe Exclusionary Rule: Costs and Viable Alternatives /
_rMalcolm Wilkey.
_tThe Exclusionary Rule: A Prosecutor's Defense /
_rStephen H. Sachs.
_tUnited States v. Leon.
505 8 0 _tAppendix - The Constitution of the United States of America.
650 0 _aLaw
_zUnited States
_9121977
650 0 _aLaw
_xPhilosophy
_968490
700 1 _aSinnott-Armstrong, Walter,
_d1955-
_eauthor
_9121980
856 4 2 _3Publisher web page
_uhttps://global.oup.com/academic/product/philosophy-of-law-9780195155129?q=frederick%20schauer7&lang=en&cc=tr#
942 _2lcc
_cBK