000 03245nam a22004215i 4500
999 _c200434303
_d52515
003 DE-He213
005 20231104114344.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 151223s2015 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 _a9783319250847
_z978-3-319-25084-7
024 7 _a10.1007/978-3-319-25084-7
_2doi
040 _aTR-AnTOB
_beng
_cTR-AnTOB
_erda
050 4 _aQA75.5-76.95
072 7 _aUB
_2bicssc
072 7 _aCOM079010
_2bisacsh
072 7 _aUB
_2thema004
_223
100 1 _aSpyns, Peter.
_eauthor.
_4aut
_4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 1 0 _aScientific Peer Reviewing :
_bPractical Hints and Best Practices /
_cby Peter Spyns, María-Esther Vidal.
264 1 _aCham :
_bSpringer International Publishing :
_bImprint: Springer,
_c2015.
300 _a1 online resource
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
520 _aThis booklet provides a practical introduction to the practice of peer reviewing. Although it mainly focuses on paper reviewing for scientific events in computer science and business informatics, many of the principles, tips, tricks and examples can also be applied to journal reviewing and other scientific domains. Some can also be used when reviewing proposals for research projects or grants. In addition, many aspects of the book will benefit authors of scientific papers, who will gain deeper insights into how papers are reviewed and hence what to pay attention to when writing their own papers. The book is divided into three chapters, the first of which presents a brief overview of why peer reviewing is considered to be an important quality control instrument for scientific papers. In turn, the second chapter elaborates on the main principles a good reviewer should adhere to, including the most important aspects of personal attitude s/he should pay attention to when writing his/her review. Lastly, the third chapter features a series of (anonymized) real life examples of actual reviewing practice, thus illustrating practical tips and tricks regarding the most common “do’s” and “don’ts” of peer reviewing.The book offers a structured introduction and practical reference guide, including good and bad examples, for junior researchers in computer science and business informatics in particular, as well as for anyone interested in peer reviewing in general.
650 0 _aComputer science.
650 0 _aScience (General).
650 1 4 _aComputing Milieux.
_0http://scigraph.springernature.com/things/product-market-codes/I24008
650 2 4 _aScience, Humanities and Social Sciences, multidisciplinary.
_0http://scigraph.springernature.com/things/product-market-codes/A11007
650 2 4 _aPopular Science, general.
_0http://scigraph.springernature.com/things/product-market-codes/Q00007
700 1 _aVidal, María-Esther.
_eauthor.
_4aut
_4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
710 2 _aSpringerLink (Online service)
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25084-7
_3Springer eBooks
_zOnline access link to the resource
942 _2lcc
_cEBK
041 _aeng