000 03940cam a2200757 i 4500
999 _c200435936
_d54148
001 200435936
003 TR-AnTOB
005 20190704160449.0
007 ta
008 090203s2009 enk b 001 0 eng
010 _a 2009004950
015 _aGBA933175
_2bnb
015 _aGBA963020
_2bnb
016 7 _a015103314
_2Uk
016 7 _a015297946
_2Uk
020 _a9780521761000
_q(hbk.)
020 _a052176100X
_q(hbk.)
020 _a9780521682190
_q(pbk.)
020 _a0521682193
_q(pbk.)
020 _a9786612585890
020 _a6612585897
029 1 _aAU@
_b000043811085
029 1 _aCDX
_b9455306
029 1 _aCDX
_b9455955
029 1 _aDEBBG
_bBV035862537
029 1 _aGEBAY
_b11594957
029 1 _aNZ1
_b13057900
029 1 _aUNITY
_b119678438
029 1 _aUNITY
_b120102404
029 1 _aUKMGB
_b015297946
029 1 _aUKMGB
_b015103314
035 _a(OCoLC)299718363
_z(OCoLC)884739993
040 _aDLC
_beng
_cDLC
_dYDX
_dBTCTA
_dYDXCP
_dUKM
_dCDX
_dGEBAY
_dU5D
_dDEBBG
_dMIX
_dBDX
_dOCLCF
_dOCLCO
_dOCLCQ
_dOCLCO
_dLND
_dOCLCQ
_dUX0
_dZ5A
_dDHA
_dOCLCQ
_dOCLCO
_dBUB
_dUKMGB
_dTR-AnTOB
_erda
041 0 _aeng
043 _ae-uk---
050 0 0 _aKD4080
_b.K383 2009
082 0 0 _a342.4108/5
_222
084 _aPL 717
_2rvk
084 _aKM211
_b.K383 2009
_2moys
090 _aKD4080
_b.K383 2009
999 _aEbA 15.05.2019
100 1 _aKavanagh, Aileen
_eauthor
_9124678
245 1 0 _aConstitutional review under the UK Human Rights Act /
_cAileen Kavanagh.
264 1 _aCambridge, UK ;
_aNew York :
_bCambridge University Press,
_c2009.
300 _axiii, 455 pages ;
_c24 cm
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _aunmediated
_bn
_2rdamedia
338 _avolume
_bnc
_2rdacarrier
504 _aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 422-443) and index.
505 0 _aPart I. Questions of Interpretation: -- 2. Sections 3 and 4 HRA: the early case-law -- 3. Interpretation after Ghaidan v. Mendoza -- 4. Section 3(1) as a strong presumption of statutory interpretation -- 5. The interplay between s.3 and s.4 -- 6. The duty of the courts under s.2(1) -- Part II. Questions of Deference: -- 7. The nature and grounds of judicial deference -- 8. Deference in particular contexts -- 9. Proportionality and deference under the Human Rights Act -- Part III. Questions of Constitutional Status and Legitimacy: -- 10. The nature and status of the HRA -- 11. Parliamentary sovereignty and the HRA -- 12. Justifying constitutional review -- 13. Constitutional review and participatory democracy -- 14. Conclusion.
520 _a"Under the Human Rights Act, British courts are for the first time empowered to review primary legislation for compliance with a codified set of fundamental rights. In this book, Aileen Kavanagh argues that the HRA gives judges strong powers of constitutional review, similar to those exercised by the courts under an entrenched Bill of Rights. The aim of the book is to subject the leading case-law under the HRA to critical scrutiny, whilst remaining sensitive to the deeper constitutional, political and theoretical questions which underpin it."--Publisher's website.
610 1 0 _aGreat Britain.
_tHuman Rights Act 1998.
610 1 7 _aGro├čbritannien
_tHuman Rights Act
_2gnd
_0(DE-588)4631324-2
610 1 4 _aGreat Britain.
_tHuman Rights Act, 1998.
630 0 7 _aHuman Rights Act 1998 (Great Britain)
_2fast
_0(OCoLC)fst01390953
650 0 _aHuman rights
_zGreat Britain
_949398
650 0 _aCivil rights
_zGreat Britain
_993480
650 7 _aCivil rights.
_2fast
_0(OCoLC)fst00862627
650 7 _aConstitutional law.
_2fast
_0(OCoLC)fst00875797
650 7 _aHuman rights.
_2fast
_0(OCoLC)fst00963285
650 7 _aVerfassungsreform
_2gnd
_0(DE-588)4062802-4
650 0 _aConstitutional law
_zGreat Britain
_981448
651 7 _aGreat Britain.
_2fast
_0(OCoLC)fst01204623
651 7 _aGro├čbritannien
_xHuman Rights Act.
_2swd
942 _2lcc
_cBK