000			02781cam a2200385 i 4500
999			_c200435939 _d54151
001			200435939
003			TR-AnTOB
005			20200410165400.0
007			ta
008			171116s2018 enk b 001 0 eng d
010			_a 2017055358
020			_a9781108426688 (hardback)
040			_aDLC _beng _erda _cDLC _dDLC _dTR-AnTOB
041	0		_aeng
050	0	0	_aKKN2650 _b.K54 2018
090			_aKKN2650 _b.K54 2018
100	1		_aKierulf, Anine, _d1974- _eauthor _9125079
245	1	0	_aJudicial review in Norway : _ba bicentennial debate / _cAnine Kierulf, Norwegian National Human Rights Institution.
250			_aFirst published 2018
264		1	_aCambridge, United Kingdom ; _aNew York, NY, USA : _bCambridge University Press, _c2018.
264		4	_c©2018
300			_axxiii, 298 pages ; _c24 cm
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_aunmediated _bn _2rdamedia
338			_avolume _bnc _2rdacarrier
490	0		_aComparative constitutional law and policy.
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references (pages: 274-289) and index.
505	0		_aIntroduction -- Legal foundations and doctrinal specifies -- Foundations reviewed : the formative 1800s -- The emerging regulatory state and a constitutional watershed (early 1900s) -- Post-World War II : social democratic constitutionalism? -- Debates of ECHR review (1950-2000) -- A triple constitutional review revival : 2010 -- 2014-2015 : rights reform and judical review constitutionalization -- Looking back - and forward.
520			_a"Judicial Review in Norway Outside the United States, Norway's 1814 constitution is the oldest still in force. Constitutional judicial review has been a part of Norwegian court decision-making for most of these 200 years. Since the 1990s, Norway has also exercised review under the European Convention of Human Rights. Judicial review of legislation can be controversial: having unelected judges overruling popularly elected majorities seems undemocratic. Yet Norway remains one of the most democratic countries in the world. How does Norway manage the balance between democracy and judicial oversight? Author Anine Kierulf tells the story of Norwegian constitutionalism from 1814 until today through the lens of judicial review debates and cases. This study adds important insights into the social and political justifications for an active judicial review component in a constitutional democracy. Anine Kierulf argues that the Norwegian model of judicial review provides a useful perspective on the dichotomy of American and European constitutionalism"-- _cProvided by publisher.
650		0	_aConstitutional law _zNorway _9125083
650		0	_aJudicial review _zNorway _9125080
942			_2lcc _cBK