000			03630cam a2200445 i 4500
001			18244123
005			20190424110906.0
008			140728s2015 enk b 001 0 eng
906			_a7 _bcbc _corignew _d1 _eecip _f20 _gy-gencatlg
925	0		_aacquire _b1 shelf copy _xpolicy default _eclaim1 2015-04-01 _eclaim2 2015-08-26
955			_exg06 2014-07-28 to Dewey _wxl03 2014-07-30 _fxg11 2015-10-20 to LL
010			_a 2014029908
020			_a9781107092686 (hardback)
040			_aDLC _beng _cDLC _erda _dDLC
041			_aeng _hger
042			_apcc
043			_ae-gx---
050	0	0	_aK339 _b.G83 2015
084			_aLAW018000 _2bisacsh
245	0	4	_aThe guardian of the constitution : _bHans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt on the limits of constitutional law / _ctranslation, introduction, and notes by Lars Vinx.
264		1	_aUnited Kingdom : _bCambridge University Press, _c2015.
300			_aix, 279 pages ; _c24 cm.
336			_atext _2rdacontent
337			_aunmediated _2rdamedia
338			_avolume _2rdacarrier
490	0		_aCambridge studies in constitutional law
520			_a"This volume provides the first English translation of Hans Kelsen's and Carl Schmitt's influential Weimar-era debate on constitutional guardianship and the legitimacy of constitutional review. It includes Kelsen's seminal piece, 'The Nature and Development of Constitutional Adjudication', as well as key extracts from the 'Guardian of the Constitution' which present Schmitt's argument against constitutional review. Also included are Kelsen's review of Schmitt's 'Guardian of the Constitution', as well as some further material by Kelsen and Schmitt on presidential dictatorship under Article 48 of the Weimar Constitution. These texts show Kelsen and Schmitt responding to one another, in the context of a debate focused on a concrete constitutional crisis, thus allowing the reader to assess the plausibility of Kelsen's and Schmitt's legal and constitutional theories"-- _cProvided by publisher.
520			_a"The aim of this series is to produce leading monographs in constitutional law. All areas of constitutional law and public law fall within the ambit of the series, including human rights and civil liberties law, administrative law, as well as constitutional theory and the history of constitutional law. A wide variety of scholarly approaches is encouraged, with the governing criterion being simply that the work is of interest to an international audience"-- _cProvided by publisher.
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 266-273) and index.
505	8		_aMachine generated contents note: Introduction; 1. Kelsen on the nature and development of constitutional adjudication; 2. The guardian of the constitution: Schmitt's argument against judicial review; 3. The guardian of the constitution: Schmitt on the President as guardian of the constitution; 4. Who ought to be the guardian of the constitution? Kelsen's reply to Schmitt; 5. Prussia contra Reich: Schmitt's closing statement in Leipzig; 6. Kelsen on the judgment of the Staatsgerichtshof of the 25th of October 1932.
600	1	0	_aKelsen, Hans, _d1881-1973 _xCorrespondence.
600	1	0	_aSchmitt, Carl, _d1888-1985 _xCorrespondence.
650		0	_aConstitutional law _xPhilosophy.
650		0	_aExecutive power _zGermany.
650		7	_aLAW / Constitutional. _2bisacsh
700	1		_aKelsen, Hans, _d1881-1973.
700	1		_aSchmitt, Carl, _d1888-1985.
700	1		_aVinx, Lars, _eeditor _etranslator.
999			_c200435952 _d54164