000			02857cam a22004098i 4500
999			_c200443570 _d61782
001			200443570
003			TR-AnTOB
005			20211109135823.0
007			ta
008			211109s2021 enk b 001 0 eng d
010			_a 2020026290
020			_a9781108489669 _q(hardback)
020			_z9781108779173 _q(ebook)
040			_aDLC _beng _erda _cDLC _dDLC _dTR-AnTOB
041	0		_aeng
042			_apcc
050	0	0	_aK3585 _b.S866 2021
090			_aK3585 _b.S866 2021
100	1		_aSulyok, Katalin, _d1986- _eauthor _9133770
245	1	0	_aScience and judicial reasoning : _bthe legitimacy of international environmental adjudication / _cKatalin Sulyok, ELTE Law School.
264		1	_aCambridge, United Kingdom ; _aNew York, NY : _bCambridge University Press, _c2021.
300			_axxxii, 398 pages ; _c24 cm
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_aunmediated _bn _2rdamedia
338			_avolume _bnc _2rdacarrier
490	0		_aCambridge studies on environment, energy and natural resources governance
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references (page : 371 - 390) and index.
505	0		_aIntroduction to a comparative study on judicial engagement with science -- The rules of judicial engagement with science : a three-fold challenge -- Judicial engagement with science in the environmental case : law of the International Court of Justice -- Science in the practice of inter-state arbitral tribunals -- Science in the environmental jurisprudence of regional human rights courts -- Scientific claims before the WTO -- Science in the practice of investment arbitral tribunals -- Science appears before the international tribunal for the Law of the Sea -- Trends in judicial engagement with science : a comparative assessment -- Science and the legitimacy of judicial reasoning.
520			_a"Science often entails connotations of 'objectivity', 'certainty', and the capability to discover the 'factual truth'. Judicial decisions, in turn, are routinely associated with resolving disputes in a 'final', 'neutral', and 'authoritative' way. Yet international environmental adjudication, where scientific and legal authority get entangled with each other, suggests that neither science nor law can fully live up to these idealized expectations. What happens if science and law yield competing narratives as to the factual basis of a dispute? Who could and should resolve their conflict and how, based on what benchmarks? Would the uncertain, probabilistic nature of scientific input diminish the authority of a legal judgment based upon it?"-- _cProvided by publisher.
650		0	_aEnvironmental law, International _950808
650		0	_aJudicial process _979392
650		0	_aScience and law.
650		0	_aArbitration (International law) _9108816
942			_2lcc _cBK