000 06066nam a22006135i 4500
999 _c200456934
_d75146
003 TR-AnTOB
005 20231109085733.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 221221s2022 sz | s |||| 0|eng d
020 _a9783031159473
024 7 _a10.1007/978-3-031-15947-3
_2doi
040 _aTR-AnTOB
_beng
_erda
_cTR-AnTOB
041 _aeng
060 _aW 820
072 7 _aMJN
_2bicssc
072 7 _aMED056000
_2bisacsh
072 7 _aMKJ
_2thema
096 _aW820EBK
245 1 0 _aDeath Determination by Neurologic Criteria
_h[electronic resource] :
_bAreas of Consensus and Controversy /
_cedited by Ariane Lewis, James L. Bernat.
250 _a1st ed. 2022.
264 1 _aCham :
_bSpringer International Publishing :
_bImprint: Springer,
_c2022.
300 _a1 online resource
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
490 1 _aAdvances in Neuroethics,
_x2522-5685
505 0 _aIntroduction/History of Death Determination by Neurologic Criteria -- Part I: Philosophical/Conceptual -- Arguments Supporting Neurologic Criteria to Determine Death -- Arguments Rejecting Neurologic Criteria to Determine Death -- Arguments Supporting the Whole-Brain Criterion -- Arguments Supporting the Brain Stem Criterion -- Loss of Hypothalamic Function is Required to Determine Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Loss of Hypothalamic Function is not Required to Determine Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Part II: Medical -- Intra/International Variability in the Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Controversies in Determining Death by Neurological Criteria in Pediatric Patients -- Arguments in Favor of Requiring the Absence of Brain Circulation to Determine Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Arguments Opposing the Requirement to Demonstrate Absence of Blood Flow to Determine Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Reports of “Recovery” from Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Observation Time Prior to Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Temperature Considerations in the Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- How Many Evaluations are Required to Determine Death by Neurologic Criteria? -- Part III: Scientific -- Research Questions about Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Research on Patients Declared Dead by Neurologic Criteria -- The Impact of Restoring Postmortem Mammalian Brain Circulation and Cellular Functions on the Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Part IV: Legal -- The Content of Laws on Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Is Consent Required for Physicians’ Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria? -- Legal Response to Religious and Other Objections to Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Death by Neurologic Criteria is a Legal Fiction -- Legal Considerations on the Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria in the Pregnant Patient -- Part V: Religious -- Christian Perspectives on Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Islamic Perspectives on Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Jewish Perspectives on Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Part VI: Ethical/Social -- Public Views on Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Cultural Considerations in the Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria in Asia -- Cultural Considerations in the Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria in Africa -- The Argument for Personal Choice in Defining Death -- The distinction Between Death Declaration and Death Determination Using Neurologic -- Criteria -- Why Families Object to Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Arguments Favoring Continuation of Organ Support when Families Object to Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Arguments Opposing Continuation of Organ Support when Families Object to Declaration of Death by Neurological Criteria.
520 _aThis book presents principal controversies over the determination of death by neurologic criteria (“brain death”). The editors and authors are exceedingly well-versed in this subject and are on the forefront of the current debates. The content is divided in the following disciplinary: philosophical (conceptual), medical, scientific, legal, religious, and ethical/social. Many of the topics feature pro-con debates, allowing readers to consider the merits of the arguments and decide their own position. The work is targeted to clinicians and nurses who treat critically ill and dying patients, organ donation personnel, ethicists and philosophers who write on end-of-life issues, and lawyers and legislative/public policy professionals who draft laws on death determination. It identifies and debates the essential controversies currently raging in academic and public policy circles over the medical adequacy, scientific validity, and conceptual coherence of death determination by neurologic criteria. Whether a professional or a student, the reader will be given a comprehensive course in the most pressing controversies and areas of consensus in the determination of death by neurologic criteria.
650 0 _aNeurology .
650 0 _aNervous system
_xSurgery.
650 0 _aMedical care.
650 0 _aNursing ethics.
650 0 _aPhilosophy.
650 0 _aSociology.
650 1 4 _aNeurology.
650 2 4 _aNeurosurgery.
650 2 4 _aHealth Care.
650 2 4 _aNursing Ethics.
650 2 4 _aPhilosophy.
650 2 4 _aSociology.
653 0 _aBrain Death
653 0 _aNeurology -- ethics
700 1 _aLewis, Ariane.
_eeditor.
_4edt
_4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
700 1 _aBernat, James L.
_eeditor.
_4edt
_4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
710 2 _aSpringerLink (Online service)
830 0 _aAdvances in Neuroethics,
_x2522-5685
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15947-3
_3Springer eBooks
_zOnline access link to the resource
942 _2NLM
_cEBK