000			03211cam a2200421 i 4500
999			_c200459137 _d77349
001			200459137
003			TR-AnTOB
005			20240315153427.0
007			TA
008			160928t20172017nyua b 001 0 eng d
010			_a2016044874
020			_a9780190612689 _qhardcover ; _qalkaline paper
020			_a0190612681 _qhardcover ; _qalkaline paper
040			_aDLC _beng _erda _cDLC _dBDX _dOCLCF _dBTCTA _dOCLCQ _dYDX _dERASA _dYDX _dOCLCO _dUtOrBLW _dTR-AnTOB
041	0		_aeng
050	0	0	_aKZ7177.A87 _bG69 2017
090			_aKZ7177.A87 _bG69 2017
100	1		_aGordon, Gregory S. _eauthor _0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2016053281 _9145199
245	1	0	_aAtrocity speech law : _bfoundation, fragmentation, fruition / _cGregory S. Gordon ; foreword by Benjamin B. Ferencz
264		1	_aNew York, NY : _bOxford University Press, _c2017.
264		4	_c©2017
300			_axxviii, 436 pages ; _c25 cm
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_aunmediated _bn _2rdamedia
338			_avolume _bnc _2rdacarrier
504			_aBIBINDX
505	0		_aSpeech and atrocity : an historical sketch -- International human rights law and domestic law -- The birth of atrocity speech law : Nuremberg and the foundational statutes -- The birth of atrocity speech law : the foundational ad hoc tribunal cases and offense elements -- Problems regarding the crime of direct and public incitement to commit genocide -- Problems regarding persecution, instigation, and ordering -- The absence of criminal prohibitions regarding hate speech and war crimes -- Fixing incitement to genocide -- Fixing persecution, instigation, and ordering -- Adopting incitement to commit war crimes -- Restructuring : a unified liability theory for atrocity speech law
520	8		_aProf. Gordon provides a broad analysis of the entire jurisprudential output related to speech and gross human rights violations for courts, government officials, and scholars. The book is organized into three parts. The first part covers the foundation: a brief history of atrocity speech and the modern treatment of hate speech in international human rights treaties and judgments under international criminal tribunals. The second part focuses on fragmentation: detailing the inconsistent application of the charges and previous prosecutions, including certain categories of inflammatory speech and a growing doctrinal rift between the ICTR and ICTY. The last part covers fruition: recommendations on how the law should be developed going forward, with proposals to fix the problems with individual speech offenses to coalesce into three categories of offense: incitement, speech-abetting, and instigation
650		0	_aHate speech _xLaw and legislation _0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2013003033 _9124681
650		0	_aAtrocities _945283
650		0	_aHate crimes _995040
650		0	_aWar crimes _0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85145168 _9116256
650		0	_aGenocide _0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85053923 _923564
650		0	_aInternational law and human rights _0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2012002128 _9116249
942			_2lcc _cBK